In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly faster than the Core i5-7600. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $44 more expensive!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Core i5-7600
- Up to 41% cheaper – $64.67 vs $109.00
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 39% better value in Atomfall – $0.31 vs $0.51/FPS
- Up to 39% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
61%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
99%
Price, $
$64.67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
