In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core i5-760 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $39 more expensive!
Core i3-10105F
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i5-760
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 36% cheaper – $70.04 vs $109.00
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.28 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-760: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
225 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
92%
Price, $
$109
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
58%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-760 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-760 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
