In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core i5-2520M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 01, 2011
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
Core i5-2520M
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-2520M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
174 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
88%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-2520M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-2520M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2520M
Feb 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2520M Feb 1st, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Feb 1st, 2011 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
