In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly faster than the Core i5-2400S and it's also a better value for money, as it's $46 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 25% cheaper – $139.00 vs $184.83
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $0.97/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall
Core i5-2400S
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-2400S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
190 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
90%
Price, $
$184.83
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-2400S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-2400S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
