In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $90 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 45% cheaper – $109.00 vs $199.00
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Atomfall – $0.51 vs $0.88/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
92%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
