In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105F is slightly faster than the Core i5-11600 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's $1 cheaper!
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 174 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 1% cheaper – $139.00 vs $140.00
- Up to 1% cheaper
- Up to 4% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.79 vs $0.82/FPS
- Up to 4% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i5-11600
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
98%
Price, $
$140
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
96%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
