In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105F is slightly faster than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $97.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
