In Control, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 8700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $114 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 46% cheaper – $134.94 vs $248.95
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in Control – $0.54 vs $0.98/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in Control
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 8700F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 253 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 16 days newer – Apr 01, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 16 days newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 7 8700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 8700F
Apr 1st, 2024
Average FPS
253 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$248.95
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
55%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 7 8700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Ryzen 7 8700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
51%
Ryzen 7 8700F
Apr 1st, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700F Apr 1st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $270.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM5 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
