In Dead Space, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $428 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 76% cheaper – $134.94 vs $563.41
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Dead Space – $0.76 vs $3.04/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Dead Space
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 5% faster in Dead Space – 185 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Dead Space
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
176 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
92 FPS
89%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
185 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
23%
Value, $/FPS
$3.04/FPS
25%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
