In Deathloop, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $312 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 70% cheaper – $134.94 vs $447.16
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Deathloop – $0.61 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
220 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
90%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
30%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
