In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10105 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $414 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 75% cheaper – $134.94 vs $548.89
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.77 vs $4.12/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 75% faster in Battlefield 6 – 133 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 75% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
76 FPS
57%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
57%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
133 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
24%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
