In Deathloop, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $284 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 68% cheaper – $136.02 vs $420.20
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Deathloop – $0.62 vs $1.88/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$136.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.2
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
