In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $59 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 30% cheaper – $134.94 vs $194.00
- Up to 30% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall – $0.64 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i7-8700K
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
98%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
71%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
