In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $11 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 8% cheaper – $132.10 vs $143.49
- Up to 8% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.58 vs $0.63/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i7-8700
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 227 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
225 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
99%
Price, $
$132.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.49
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
92%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
