In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105 is slightly faster than the Core i7-3770K and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $1 more expensive!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 9% better value in Atomfall – $0.62 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i7-3770K
- Up to 0% cheaper – $131.58 vs $132.10
- Up to 0% cheaper
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-3770K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$132.1
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
92%
Price, $
$131.58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
91%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $313.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
