In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105 is slightly faster than the Core i7-2630QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-2630QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-2630QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-2630QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-2630QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2630QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
