In Atomfall, the Core i3-10105 is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $116 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 48% cheaper – $124.13 vs $240.23
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall – $0.59 vs $1.03/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
91%
Price, $
$124.13
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$240.23
51%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
