In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10105 is slightly faster than the Core i5-11400F and it's also a better value for money, as it's $68 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 34% cheaper – $134.94 vs $203.16
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.77 vs $1.19/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11400F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
98%
Price, $
$203.16
66%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
