In Control, the Core i3-10105 is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $36 more expensive!
Core i3-10105
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 27% cheaper – $98.95 vs $134.94
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Control – $0.40 vs $0.54/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.94
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
74%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
245 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
