In Rust, the Core i3-10100 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10100
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 226 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
