In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10100 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
175 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
98%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
