Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 3 3200G - 144 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $76.00 vs $91.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i3-10100 - $0.54 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $91.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Buy for $76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |