In Atomfall, the Core i3-10100 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $413 cheaper!
Core i3-10100
- Up to 73% cheaper – $149.94 vs $563.41
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall – $0.71 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
84%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
26%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
