In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10100 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $303 cheaper!
Core i3-10100
- Up to 67% cheaper – $149.94 vs $452.68
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.99 vs $3.32/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 81% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 81% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
75 FPS
55%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
55%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
33%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
