In F1 22, the Core i3-10100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-930. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $149 cheaper!
Core i3-10100
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 49% cheaper – $158.00 vs $307.29
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in F1 22 – $0.44 vs $0.81/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in F1 22
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Up to 5% faster in F1 22 – 375 vs 358 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in F1 22
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
358 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
248 FPS
98%
Price, $
$158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
375 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
253 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
51%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
