In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-10100 is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700F and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $180 cheaper!
Core i3-10100
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 226 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 55% cheaper – $149.94 vs $329.95
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.66 vs $1.48/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
98%
Price, $
$329.95
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
45%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
