In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-10100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $64 more expensive!
Core i3-10100
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Core i5-7600
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 176 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 46% cheaper – $75.05 vs $139.00
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.42 vs $0.79/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
99%
Price, $
$139
53%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
53%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$75.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
