In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10100 is slightly faster than the Core i5-7500T. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i3-10100
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 76 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Core i5-7500T
- Up to 13% cheaper – $130.43 vs $149.94
- Up to 13% cheaper
- Up to 4% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.89 vs $1.97/FPS
- Up to 4% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-7500T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.94
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
96%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
69 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
89%
Price, $
$130.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
