Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $91.99 vs $849.99
- Up to 89% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-13400F - $0.48 vs $4.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-10100 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6299 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
11%
Price, $
$849.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |