In Control, the Core i3-10100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $10 more expensive!
Core i3-10100
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 251 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 7% cheaper – $140.00 vs $149.94
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Control – $0.55 vs $0.60/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
248 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$149.94
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
92%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
