In Deathloop, the Core i3-10100 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $45 cheaper!
Core i3-10100
- Up to 24% cheaper – $139.00 vs $183.99
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Deathloop – $0.63 vs $0.83/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$183.99
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
76%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
