In Deathloop, the Core i3-10100 is same performance as the Core i3-7100T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $125 more expensive!
Core i3-10100
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 83% cheaper – $25.00 vs $149.94
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Deathloop – $0.11 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.94
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
16%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
