In Deathloop, the Core i3-1005G1 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-1005G1
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Aug 01, 2019 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-1005G1 vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-1005G1
Aug 1st, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-1005G1 Aug 1st, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 1st, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
