HowManyFPS Desktop AppTrack Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core 7 350 vs Core Ultra 7 265F

The Core 7 350 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

All CPUs

Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Up to 24% more expensive – $469 vs $316.00

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 9% faster on average across 100+ games
Up to 24% cheaper – $316.00 vs $469
Up to 35% better value for money

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

Core 7 350

366FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

403FPS

Valorant2020

Core 7 350

739FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

781FPS

Rust2018

Core 7 350

343FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

356FPS

Overwatch 22023

Core 7 350

558FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

569FPS

Dota 22013

270FPS

296FPS

701FPS

736FPS

Fortnite2017

Core 7 350

329FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

324FPS

Apex Legends2019

Core 7 350

382FPS

Core Ultra 7 265F

388FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core 7 350

69%

Core Ultra 7 265F

70%

Core Ultra 7 265F ranks 1 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core 7 350

Core Ultra 7 265F

Core Ultra 7 265F has 14 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core 7 350

Core Ultra 7 265F

Core Ultra 7 265F has 14 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core 7 350

6 MB

Core Ultra 7 265F

30 MB

Core Ultra 7 265F has 24 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core 7 350

1.5 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F

2.4 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F has a 60% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core 7 350

4.8 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F

5.3 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F boosts 10% higher.

TDPhelp

Core 7 350

15W

Core Ultra 7 265F

65W

Core 7 350 draws 50W less power.

Pricehelp

Core 7 350

Core Ultra 7 265F

$316.00

Core 7 350Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel BGA 1516

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Wildcat Lake

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

6400 MHz (DDR5), 7467 MHz (LPDDR5X)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core 7 350 or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F. It's 1% faster than the Core 7 350 on average across 100+ games, scoring 70/100 vs 69/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265F than Core 7 350?expand_more

1% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core 7 350 or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265F worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 70/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core 7 350 and Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

Performance: Core 7 350 scores 69/100, Core Ultra 7 265F scores 70/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core 7 350 or Core Ultra 7 265F bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core 7 350 or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F is the stronger pick at 70/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Recent Public Benchmarks

View All

All GPUs

All CPUs

Popular Comparisons