In Deathloop, the Core 5 220H is slightly faster than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 5 220H
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 9 months newer – Dec 18, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core 5 220H vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 5 220H vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 5 220H vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 5 220H
Dec 18th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 5 220H Dec 18th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 18th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $342.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
