In Deathloop, the Core 5 220H is slightly faster than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 5 220H
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Dec 18, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core 5 220H vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
95%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 5 220H vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 5 220H vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 5 220H
Dec 18th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 5 220H Dec 18th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 18th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $342.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | AM3+ |
45W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
