In Atomfall, the Core 5 220H is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 5 220H
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Dec 18, 2024 vs Oct 17, 2023
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core 5 220H vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 5 220H vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 5 220H vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core 5 220H
Dec 18th, 2024
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
18 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
82%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
93%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 5 220H Dec 18th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 18th, 2024 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$342.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
