In The Last of Us Part II, the Core 5 210H is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 5 210H
- Is 1 month and 24 days newer – Dec 18, 2024 vs Oct 24, 2024
- Is 1 month and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 171 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
100%
Price, $
$494.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.89/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core 5 210H
Dec 18th, 2024
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
84%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
81%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 5 210H Dec 18th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 18th, 2024 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$342.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Iris Xe Graphics 48EU | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
