HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.26.0Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core 5 210H vs Core Ultra 9 285K

The Core 5 210H is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

View All CPUs

Is 2 months newer
Up to 72% cheaper – $342 vs $539.00
Up to 29% better value for money

CPU

$539.00View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 33% faster on average across 100+ games
Up to 72% more expensive – $539.00 vs $342

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

Core 5 210H

319FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

439FPS

Fortnite2017

Core 5 210H

332FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

316FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core 5 210H

217FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

226FPS

Elden Ring2022

Core 5 210H

165FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

182FPS

Escape From Tarkov2017

Destiny 22017

596FPS

585FPS

Valorant2020

Core 5 210H

689FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

822FPS

Minecraft2011

Core 5 210H

722FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

861FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core 5 210H

59%

Core Ultra 9 285K

75%

Core Ultra 9 285K ranks 16 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core 5 210H

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 16 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core 5 210H

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 12 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core 5 210H

12 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K

36 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core 5 210H

2.2 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

3.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K has a 68% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core 5 210H

4.8 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

5.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 19% higher.

TDPhelp

Core 5 210H

45W

Core Ultra 9 285K

125W

Core 5 210H draws 80W less power.

Pricehelp

Core 5 210H

Core Ultra 9 285K

$539.00

Core 5 210HCore Ultra 9 285K

Intel BGA 1744

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Raptor Lake-H

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

Iris Xe Graphics 48EU

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core 5 210H or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 27% faster than the Core 5 210H on average across 100+ games, scoring 75/100 vs 59/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Core 5 210H?expand_more

27% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core 5 210H or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 75/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core 5 210H and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

Performance: Core 5 210H scores 59/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 75/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core 5 210H or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core 5 210H or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 75/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.