In Deathloop, the Core 3 N355 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 3 N355
- Is 15 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 15 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core 3 N355 vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 3 N355 vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 3 N355 vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 3 N355
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
4%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 3 N355 Jan 7th, 2025 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2025 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $215.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | LGA1156 |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5), 4800 MHz (LPDDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
