In Rust, the Core 3 N355 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 3 N355
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 220 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 14 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 3 N355
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
4%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 3 N355 Jan 7th, 2025 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2025 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5), 4800 MHz (LPDDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
