In Atomfall, the Core 3 N355 is slightly faster than the FX-9370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 3 N355
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
FX-9370
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core 3 N355 vs FX-9370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 3 N355 vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 3 N355 vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 3 N355
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
2%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. LPDDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 3 N355 Jan 7th, 2025 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2025 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 220W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5), 4800 MHz (LPDDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
