In Deathloop, the Core 3 N355 is slightly slower than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 3 N355
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core 3 N355 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 3 N355 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 3 N355 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 3 N355
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
3%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 3 N355 Jan 7th, 2025 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2025 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5), 4800 MHz (LPDDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
