In Rust, the Core 3 N355 is slightly faster than the FX-6200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 3 N355
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 221 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-6200
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core 3 N355 vs FX-6200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
80%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 3 N355 vs FX-6200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 3 N355 vs FX-6200 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 3 N355
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
3%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
95%
Max. LPDDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 3 N355 Jan 7th, 2025 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2025 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5), 4800 MHz (LPDDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
