In Rust, the Core 3 N355 is slightly faster than the Celeron B820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core 3 N355
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 220 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 15 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Celeron B820
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core 3 N355 vs Celeron B820: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core 3 N355 vs Celeron B820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core 3 N355 vs Celeron B820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core 3 N355
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
6%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core 3 N355 Jan 7th, 2025 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2025 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
15W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5), 4800 MHz (LPDDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
