Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron G6900E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 912 days older than Celeron G6900E.
Advantages of Celeron G6900E
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G6900E - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900E - 12 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900E | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |