In Minecraft, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5649. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 2% faster in Minecraft – 1079 vs 1058 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Minecraft
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 46 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5649
No clear advantages
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5649: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
1079 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
236 FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5649 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5649 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
46W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
