In Deathloop, the Celeron G6900 is same performance as the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 46 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
46W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
