In Deathloop, the Celeron G6900 is same performance as the Xeon E5-2643. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 46 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2643
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5-2643: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$100.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5-2643 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5-2643 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2011 |
46W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
