In Deathloop, the Celeron G6900 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 46 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2640
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5-2640: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$95.82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5-2640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E5-2640 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2640
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2640 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2011 |
46W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
